2. THE NEED FOR THE RIGHT PROCESS, FOR THE RIGHT PLAN
Therefore, a number of key elements need to be in place to ensure the process is robust enough to retain public confidence and produce the right balance for the future of Greater Manchester. The following attempts to outline areas where we believe improvements can be made.

2.1. The need for a truly responsive process for public confidence
The GMSF is a process. The proof that the process is a strong one will only be demonstrated through a strong indication that submissions to the first phase of consultation have been heeded, and that public voices have been listened to and not ignored.

2.2. The need for clearer communication of the process.
More work needs to be done on making the consultation process both accessible and understood. In particular:
I. Greater effort needs to be shown in explaining the relationship between local plans, the GMSF and the role of Local Authorities in having final approval over GMSF plans. In our view, this so far has remained opaque to the public, leading to some confusion over the role of GMSF and a view this is a ‘top down’ imposition. Related to this, more clarity over the role of Local Authorities in having the final say on tenure mix in town centres could also help sure up public perceptions of accountability.